![macbook pro early 2013 upgradability macbook pro early 2013 upgradability](https://s1.bukalapak.com/img/6824302952/large/Macbook_Pro_Retina_Mid_2014_Core_i5___SSD_256GB___Ram_8GB___.jpg)
Sometimes a business segment should be harvested, it's just business. However, I am not sure that Apple is making a mistake here. There is more pressure to make money now while it's still possible. In a harvesting situation, the lost future sales and ecosystem damage are deemed less relevant, so the downward pressure on prices is lower. The downward pressure on prices is more complex - when you raise prices, you lose some immediate profit (the immediate sales you lose from the price hike), and you also lose future profits (the non-sales are less likely to buy your products in the future) and harm the overall ecosystem (the lost users won't be buying third-party software, etc). The upward pressure on prices is profit per buyer, obviously. There is always both upward and downward pressure on prices. We also have higher prices, which is a classical harvesting strategy. The new features that Apple does develop (like the Touch Bar) are obvious candidates to be brought over to iOS. MacBook pros being released just before Kaby Lake is about to become available).Ĥ. (The 15" MacBook Pro was for the last year or so a joke relative to the competition.)ģ.
#Macbook pro early 2013 upgradability mac
Longer delays between updates - not just to niche items like the Mac Pro, but even to the mighty MacBook Pros. Is there anybody who disputes this? We have:ġ. If something with 6-10 Thunderbolt 3 ports, 20+ CPU cores, and, say, 12+ TFLOPs of GPU shows up in the first half of next year, there won't really be any significant platform-relevant use cases that machine can't accommodate just fine.Īpple is not investing as much in the Mac as they have in years past. As others have mentioned, a lot of institutional customers don't do aftermarket upgrades anyway.Īs Xeon core counts climb, Thunderbolt bandwidth increases, and flash storage prices fall, the negative consequences of the design trade-offs Apple chose to make in the first-generation cylinder Mac Pro will be relevant to fewer use cases with each revision. GPU upgradability in tower Mac Pros was almost an unintended consequence of the fact that a PCIe slot was the easiest way for Apple to put a GPU in a tower. Aftermarket upgradability, beyond RAM and storage, has not been a major priority for Apple since the start of the second Jobs era. The Mac Pro extends across a wider range of configurations (and consequently a wider price range) than any other Mac. This approach absolutely does not meet the needs of professionals who need to configure the box for their specific application/industry. Apple is treating the Mac Pro with a one-size-fits-all consumer mentality, that offers little or no choice of options, and no possibility for user upgrades. The problem is also with the design philosophy itself.
#Macbook pro early 2013 upgradability update
You make it sound like the only issue with the Mac Pro is the absurdly long update lag.